The Sustainability of Modern Intensive Poultry Farming: A Global Analysis

Intensive poultry farming (the rearing of chickens and hens under high-density conditions with concentrated feed) has grown rapidly in recent decades, providing large volumes of meat and eggs.

ANIMAL PRODUCTION

8/22/20259 min read

Intensive poultry farming (the rearing of chickens and hens under high-density conditions with concentrated feed) has grown rapidly in recent decades, providing large volumes of meat and eggs. Unlike ruminant livestock, this model focuses on short production cycles with genetically high-yielding breeds. Below is an evaluation of its environmental, social, and economic impacts, backed by international sources.

Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions

Relatively Low Intensity: According to the FAO, the production of chicken meat and eggs has a much lower emission intensity than that of beef or lamb (1). Globally, livestock farming generates approximately 6.2 Gt of CO₂-eq annually (~12% of anthropogenic emissions), of which only 9% correspond to poultry (bovines contribute ~62%) (1, 2). This shows that although poultry farming contributes to climate change, its footprint is smaller than that of red meat.
Origin of Emissions: In intensive poultry production, the largest GHGs come from feed cultivation (use of fertilizers, agricultural energy) and manure management. The production of balanced feed, based on cereals and oilseeds, concentrates CO₂ and N₂O emissions (3). Additionally, stored manure produces methane (CH₄) and nitrogen oxide (N₂O) emissions, although to a lesser extent than in cattle. In contrast, chickens do not emit methane from belching, as they are monogastric. The FAO estimates that up to 40% of the emissions from poultry chains are attributed to energy consumption (for example, on farms and in processing plants) (4).
Comparison with Other Meats: An international study confirms that, on average, the water and land footprint per kilogram of chicken is much smaller than that of beef and also lower than that of pork (6, 7). For example, producing 1 kg of beef can require 4–7 times more water than 1 kg of chicken (7). This is due to better feed conversion (lower FCR) and the absence of intense enteric fermentation in birds. Despite this, intensive poultry farming demands an intensive use of inputs (fertilizers, land for grain cultivation, electricity for farms), which concentrates indirect environmental impacts.

Use of Natural Resources: Water, Land, and Energy

Water: Water requirements per unit of product are lower in poultry than in other animals. The global water footprint of chicken is around 4,300–6,000 liters per kg of meat (including green, blue, and gray water), while that of cattle reaches ~10,000–15,000 L/kg (6, 7). However, intensive production uses a lot of clean water for washing barns and for animal consumption, making water efficiency on the farm key.
Land: Although chickens occupy less grazing land, their feed depends on extensive crops (corn, soy, wheat) that require large agricultural areas. Globally, up to a third of crops on agricultural land are destined for animal feed. Consequently, intensive poultry farming does indirectly contribute to land-use change (e.g., deforestation for crops), although less so than extensive ruminant farming.
Energy: Modern farms consume a lot of electricity (lighting, ventilation, heating). For example, a full-cycle broiler barn (~49 days) typically uses 2,600–3,000 kWh just for lighting (8). Additionally, forced ventilation, refrigeration, and heating systems represent significant energy costs. The implementation of efficient lighting technologies (LED) and renewable energy (solar panels) can reduce this consumption (8, 9).

Waste and Its Management (Manure and Ammonia)

Litter: Poultry manure (litter) is rich in nitrogen and phosphorus. Without proper treatment, its storage releases ammonia (NH₃) and odors. IFC guidelines (World Bank Group) indicate that air emissions in poultry farming mainly come from ammonia generated during the decomposition of feces (10). Poor management can create sources of soil and water contamination from nitrate leaching.
Ammonia and Nitrate Emissions: Recent regulations (for example, RD 637/2021 in Spain and EU regulations) indicate that intensive poultry farming particularly impacts ammonia and nitrate emissions, and to a lesser extent GHGs (CH₄ and N₂O) (11). For this reason, rigorous manure management is required: vegetative covers or terraces to prevent runoff, storage in hermetic containers, rapid application to the soil as fertilizer, or conversion into stabilized compost.
Energy Recovery: To improve sustainability, solutions such as the anaerobic digestion of poultry litter are increasingly adopted. Fermentation in a biogas plant allows for the generation of renewable electricity and heat, strongly reducing CH₄ emissions compared to stored manure (12). In Germany, for example, a large part of livestock manure (up to 30%) is already destined for biogas plants; chicken manure has high energy potential (12). This energy recovery turns a waste product into a useful resource and reduces air pollution.

Animal Welfare

Density and Housing: Intensive farms usually house thousands of birds in enclosed spaces. European legislation sets density limits to protect welfare. The general standard allows up to 33 kg of chicken/m² (≈13 broilers of 2.5 kg each) (13). It is only permitted to reach 39 kg/m² (or up to 42 kg in exceptional cases) if additional requirements are met (environmental quality, low pathologies) (13). For laying hens, the EU banned conventional cages in 2012; now enriched cages with perches and dust baths are required to allow for natural behaviors (14). Despite this, in many intensive farms, long lighting cycles (up to 23 h/day) cause stress and alter natural rhythms (8).
Health and Behavior Problems: High genetic growth and high densities cause frequent problems: in broilers, there is a high incidence of lameness, bone deformities, and metabolic disorders (15). In laying hens, cages (despite being improved) still cause osteoporosis, bone fractures, and limit instinctive behaviors (dust bathing, scratching the ground) (16). Furthermore, intensive poultry farming routinely requires beak trimming in laying hens to prevent cannibalism, a controversial practice due to the harm it can cause to the bird.
Transport and Slaughter: Stress in the transport of live animals and slaughter practices are also a concern. EU rules (Reg. 1099/2009) require effective stunning to minimize pain. Some technological innovations (for example, stunning in low-pressure chambers) seek to improve this final step without stress.

Economic and Social Impact

Affordable Protein and Nutrition: Intensive poultry farming has made chicken and eggs affordable and accessible proteins for most people. The FAO points out that a sustained increase in the supply of poultry products tends to reduce consumer prices, expanding access to nutritious food (17). This has a great social impact: improving protein intake levels often translates into better child development and public health, especially in areas where low-protein diets predominate (17). In developing countries, raising poultry is the most affordable form of livestock for rural families, acting as a "credit card" that generates quick income (18).
Job Creation: The intensive poultry chain creates jobs in feed production, farms, hatcheries, processing, and distribution. Although many operations are vertically integrated (from the feed mill to the slaughterhouse under a single company) (19), thousands of suppliers and workers depend on logistics and related services. At the rural level, even small producers can integrate into contract systems with poultry companies for third-party breeding. However, the concentration of the industry can displace family farmers who cannot compete on an industrial scale, posing socioeconomic challenges.
Social Impact: Intensive poultry farming is considered a key development activity in many countries. In the social sphere, it has empowered vulnerable populations: for example, the FAO documents that many rural women gain significant economic autonomy by raising hens, allocating their own income to family education and health (20). However, concerns about animal welfare and pollution have also generated conflicts: communities near intensive farms sometimes demand stricter regulations due to odors or emissions.

Technological Innovations to Improve Sustainability

Precision Nutrition: More efficient feeds (high protein content, additives to improve digestibility) are being developed that optimize feed conversion and reduce excreted nutrients. For example, feed additives can decrease ammonia production in feces. Some research centers apply tailored diets that maximize amino acid balance, reducing nitrogenous waste.
Advanced Genetics: Commercial genetic lines have been selected to grow faster on less feed. Genetic improvement continues to focus on efficiency: chickens with better feed conversion mean fewer resources per kilogram produced. However, this must be balanced with health and robustness to avoid pathologies associated with extreme growth.
Automation and Sensors (Precision Poultry Farming): The implementation of sensor technology is transforming the sector. Cameras, microphones, and environmental sensors monitor the weight, temperature, CO₂, ammonia, and activity of the birds in real time (21). With machine learning, the future weight of batches can be predicted 72 hours in advance, allowing for early adjustments in feeding or climate (21). Mobile robots in the barns can even stimulate the chickens' movement and aerate the litter; one study showed that robots that vacuum and spray disinfectants on the litter significantly reduce the incidence of Salmonella (21). These innovations improve biosecurity, reduce mortality, and optimize resources.
Biosecurity: Advanced vaccines and strict quarantine/biosecurity practices limit disease outbreaks (e.g., avian influenza), which reduces mortality and the need for medication. There are health certification programs (SPF “specific pathogen-free,” OIE/WOAH standards) that increase the overall resistance of the flock. Traceability with RFID and blockchain is beginning to be applied to ensure that birds come from farms free of certain pathogens, improving trust in the food chain.

International Regulations and Certifications

Official Legislation and Standards: At the international level, several organizations regulate poultry practices. The World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE/WOAH) and the FAO offer guidelines on biosecurity and the responsible use of antimicrobials. In the EU, binding directives regulate welfare (for example, Directive 1999/74 prohibits conventional laying cages; Directive 2007/43 sets maximum densities for broilers with welfare control requirements) (22). Environmental regulations also exist: the EU has established "Best Available Techniques (BAT)" to reduce ammonia emissions on intensive farms (Decision 2017/302) and limits on nitrates and pesticides related to poultry farming. Many regions require specific environmental licenses for poultry facilities.
Private Certifications: There are multiple voluntary certification programs that cover sustainability, food safety, and animal welfare. For example, GLOBALG.A.P. offers protocols for good agricultural practices for chickens, covering traceability, hygiene, and environmental criteria. In animal welfare, labels such as RSPCA Assured (UK) or Animal Welfare Approved certify birds raised under stricter standards (cage-free, access to enrichments). For global sustainability, initiatives like the Better Chicken Commitment (supported by NGOs) commit retailers to only purchase chicken meat from farms with reduced densities and better practices. Although regulations vary by country, the trend is growing toward integrated regulations (e.g., ISO 14001 standards on farms) and external audits that validate environmental and social compliance in poultry farming.

Public Perception and Consumer Pressure

Awareness and Demand for "Clean Production": Public opinion is increasingly sensitive to animal welfare and the environment. International surveys indicate that the majority of consumers want to know the origin of poultry products and prefer more ethical farming systems (23). This has boosted the market for "free-range" eggs and chicken certified as antibiotic-free.
Activism and Corporate Sustainability: Civil organizations and social media have denounced the negative impacts of intensive livestock farming, pushing for more sustainable practices. In response, supermarket chains and poultry companies are adopting ESG (environmental, social, and governance) standards and product labels that highlight sustainable attributes (e.g., organic poultry farming, compensation for emissions in feed). For example, major stores have announced plans to sell only eggs from cage-free hens in the coming years.
Consumer Trends: In recent years, there has been a growing demand for alternative options (organic chicken, plant-based protein products), although conventional chicken remains very popular because it is affordable and versatile. Young urban consumers tend to show greater interest in traceability and welfare labels, influencing the industry to gradually improve its standards.

Conclusion

In summary, modern intensive poultry farming is more sustainable in terms of GHGs and resource use per kg of protein than other red meats, but it is not without environmental impacts and ethical challenges. Its global GHG emissions are modest (below 10% of the total livestock sector) and its water footprint is relatively low (2, 7). However, mass production requires a large amount of feed (cultivable land, fertilizers) and generates waste (manure/ammonia) that must be managed with appropriate technologies (composting, biogas) (10, 12). Regarding animal welfare, densities and practices have been regulated, but physical health problems and the limitation of natural behaviors persist under the intensive model (13, 24). The comprehensive sustainability of intensive poultry farming today depends on continuous innovations (precision nutrition, automation, genomics) and compliance with increasingly demanding regulations (14, 21). Finally, social factors—employment in the production chain and access to cheap protein for vast sectors—must be balanced with the inclusion of small producers and public acceptance. Overall, the evidence shows that intensive poultry farming can improve its environmental and social indicators, but it requires constant efforts in innovation, regulation, and commitment from the industry and consumers to be truly sustainable.

Sources: FAO (various reports) (1, 3, 16, 17, 24); IPCC/UN reports (2); IFC/FAO guidelines on the environment and welfare (10, 14); European and national regulations (11, 13); related scientific articles and reports (6, 8, 12, 21, 23).

(1, 3, 4) Enfrentando el cambio climático a través de la ganadería

https://www.fao.org/4/i3437s/i3437s04.pdf

(2, 5) Microsoft PowerPoint - Pathways_TechnicallPresentation_GASL_July2024 - Read-Only

https://www.livestockdialogue.org/fileadmin/templates/res_livestock/docs/Events/Pathways_TechnicalPresentation_GASL_July2024.pdf

(6) The water footprint of poultry, pork and beef_ A comparative study in different countries and production systems

https://www.waterfootprint.org/resources/Gerbens-et-al-2013-waterfootprint-poultry-pork-beef_1.pdf

(7) untitled

https://agua.org.mx/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/PAV4.pdf

(8, 9) Ahorro de energía en avicultura - Producción Animal

https://www.veterinariadigital.com/articulos/ahorro-de-energia-en-avicultura/

(10) Guía sobre medio ambiente, salud y seguridad para la producción de aves de corral

https://www.ifc.org/content/dam/ifc/doc/2000/2007-poultry-production-ehs-guidelines-es.pdf