Technical Comparison: GPS Collar (Virtual Fence) vs. Apple AirTag
The safety of our pets is paramount, and there are an increasing number of technological options for tracking lost dogs or preventing them from running away
PETS
9/16/20259 min read
The safety of our pets is paramount, and there are an increasing number of technological options for tracking lost dogs or preventing them from running away. In general, a GPS Dog Fence refers to collars or virtual fence systems that use GPS and mobile networks to define perimeters and locate a dog, while the Apple AirTag is a Bluetooth device from Apple designed for personal items. Below is a comparison of both approaches based on various technical and practical criteria.
Real-Time Tracking Precision
GPS dog collars offer true real-time tracking. For example, some devices show the animal's location with updates every 2–3 seconds (1). Because they use GPS satellites and mobile connectivity (GSM/LTE), they can provide exact position coordinates with only a few meters of error. In contrast, the AirTag does not provide continuous tracking. The AirTag only reports the last known position when it is detected by a nearby iPhone, but it does not constantly send updated coordinates (2). In practice, this means that with a GPS collar, you see your dog moving in real time, while with an AirTag, you only get the last registered location (e.g., where it last passed by an Apple device).
PAJ, a provider of GPS trackers, summarizes it this way: GPS trackers have "high accuracy thanks to the use of GPS, GSM, and satellites," while the AirTag tracks "via Bluetooth and the network of nearby Apple devices" with "limited accuracy outside the range" of those devices (3). In short, a GPS collar offers instant and continuous location, while an AirTag only shows the last known position when it encounters an iPhone.
Range and Connection Dependency (Bluetooth vs. GPS/LTE)
GPS collars transmit location using cellular networks, so they can locate the dog anywhere with mobile coverage. They do not depend on being near the owner or other phones, as they use satellites and GSM/LTE. In fact, as Tractive points out, GPS trackers "use mobile data and GPS to help you locate your dog at any distance" (4). This means they have a practically unlimited range (depending on the carrier plan and model) and work even in isolated areas (countryside or mountains) as long as there's a satellite signal and cellular coverage (5).
The AirTag, on the other hand, operates via Bluetooth LE and Apple's "Find My" network. Its direct Bluetooth range is only a few meters, and its updates depend on any nearby iOS device logging its presence. In practice, if there isn't a nearby iPhone or iPad, the AirTag won't communicate its position. Tractive warns that the correct functioning of the AirTag "depends on a network of other Apple devices nearby" (6): without these devices, the AirTag will not report its location. In other words, the AirTag only works within the Bluetooth range of another iPhone or iPad, so its coverage is limited to densely populated urban areas with Apple users (7, 8).
As the PAJ comparison table synthesizes, GPS trackers provide "global or regional coverage, depending on the model and SIM used," while the AirTag is "limited to the Apple Find My network" and "not recommended for rural areas or areas without nearby Apple devices" (9). In summary: a GPS collar offers autonomous tracking via satellite/LTE over a wide range (worldwide), while the AirTag depends on Bluetooth/Apple for any location record.
Use in Urban vs. Rural Environments
Urban Environments: In busy cities, where there are many iPhone users and cellular coverage, an AirTag can be useful for locating a lost dog if an Apple device detects the AirTag and transmits the location. In these dense scenarios, the AirTag can update with some frequency thanks to the Find My network. However, even in the city, its reliability is lower than that of a GPS system. For example, Applesfera highlights that the AirTag "should work relatively well in large and medium-sized cities" (8), but this effectiveness quickly diminishes in less inhabited areas. GPS collars, for their part, work normally in any city, as they use the cellular network.
Rural Environments: In rural or isolated areas (mountains, countryside, sparsely populated areas), the situation changes drastically. Apple's "Find My" network may not be useful if almost no one has an iPhone, so an AirTag might not log anything all day. Tractive notes that in rural areas, "it will be more difficult to track them" with an AirTag and that they "can be completely untraceable in some areas" (10). In contrast, a GPS collar will maintain its function as long as there is a satellite signal and some cellular coverage. Even in places with low coverage, the GPS collar can transmit data or at least locally save recent coordinates until the connection is restored. In fact, some GPS systems offer special modes ("forest mode" from SpotOn, for example) to improve the signal in areas with dense vegetation (11). In conclusion, the AirTag can be useful in the city (if there are many iPhones), but it is unreliable in rural areas; the GPS collar is more versatile, covering both environments.
Battery Life and Maintenance
The AirTag has a user-replaceable button cell battery (CR2032) with a surprisingly long lifespan. According to Apple, it lasts at least a year before needing to be replaced (12). It is not rechargeable: when it runs out, you just open the accessory, replace the battery, and continue using it. This means very little maintenance: a single battery change per year.
GPS collars for dogs usually have internal rechargeable batteries with higher power consumption. Their battery life varies depending on the model and usage (active geofences, live tracking, etc.), but generally lasts from a few hours to several days. As the PAJ table indicates, a GPS collar's battery can last "from days to weeks" (13), depending on the model. This means they require periodic recharging (often every night or every few days). Additionally, they may need extra maintenance: for example, ensuring the device's SIM card remains active with a data plan. While we won't get into costs, it's important to note that a GPS collar needs frequent charging, while an AirTag works for months without attention.
Installation and Ease of Use
The AirTag is very easy to install. Simply bring it close to an unlocked iPhone; a window will automatically appear to pair it (tap "Connect"), assign a name, and register it to your Apple account (14). Once configured, the AirTag is ready. To use it with a dog, you need to attach it to the collar, which requires a special accessory (a case or holder). A common drawback of the AirTag is that it doesn't have a built-in hole; you must buy a case to attach it to the collar. As Applesfera comments, "they don't have a little hole to put them on... you have to buy specially designed cases" (even the official ones are expensive) (15). In short, the digital setup of the AirTag is almost automatic, but you must find a suitable physical attachment.
The GPS collar (Dog Fence) usually requires more initial steps. First, you install the collar on the dog (adjusting the strap/harness tightly). Then, you typically install a mobile app where you register the device. In the app, you define the geofences or virtual safe zones, indicating the boundaries (e.g., the perimeter of the yard). Sometimes the system guides you to calibrate the device or train the dog (for example, teaching it not to cross the fence). This process is more laborious than with an AirTag: you have to define the area on a digital map and complete the installation. Once done, daily use is simple, but the initial setup is more complex than just "taking it out of the box and pairing it." In summary, the AirTag wins in installation simplicity (especially if you're already an Apple user), while the GPS Dog Fence involves configuring a new app and possibly going through a period of dog training.
Mobile Device Compatibility
The AirTag is only compatible with the Apple ecosystem. It requires an updated iPhone or iPad: it needs the Find My app on iOS, and there is no tracking app for Android. In countries with a majority of Android users (like Spain), this greatly limits its usefulness. In fact, Applesfera notes that in Spain, only ~12.7% of mobile phones are iPhones, with the rest being Android (16), which makes the coverage of the Find My network weak. An Android phone can only read an AirTag via NFC to reveal contact data if found, but it cannot actively track it. Therefore, the AirTag is excluded for Android owners unless they have a secondary Apple device.
GPS collars for dogs usually offer native apps for both iOS and Android. As the PAJ comparison indicates, GPS trackers "have applications for iOS and Android" (17), while the AirTag only accepts Apple devices. In practice, almost any smartphone can use a GPS pet tracker (by downloading the app), but the AirTag can only be managed from an iPhone/iPad. This also means that multiple family members can share the GPS information (Android or iOS app), something that with an AirTag would only be possible for whoever has the linked Apple ID.
Practical Use Cases
Dogs Escaping from the Yard (Virtual Fence): A GPS collar specialized in virtual fences allows you to define the yard's perimeter and usually alerts the owner immediately if the dog crosses it. Many systems issue notifications or sounds when they detect the escape, and training corrections can even be activated. For example, Tractive highlights features like "virtual fence": you'll receive an alert if your pet leaves the safe area (18). The AirTag, on the other hand, does not send preventive alerts. It will only show the dog's location later, when a nearby iPhone detects the AirTag. That is, it does not give an immediate warning of the escape, it only records the last known position. Therefore, for detecting escapes from the yard, the GPS collar is much more effective.
Off-leash Walks: If the dog is loose, a GPS collar offers live tracking of its location. The owner can see on their phone where the dog is instantly (every few seconds) and be guided in case it gets lost. With an AirTag, this function fails: you will only get the last location when the dog crosses paths with an Apple user. This means that, on a walk, an AirTag can take a long time or not report the actual location as the dog moves away. In other cases, when the owner discovers the dog is missing, the AirTag can help locate it later, but it is not as immediate or precise as GPS.
Travel and Excursions: For traveling with a pet, GPS collars offer international coverage if they have a global SIM (e.g., some promise to work in 150+ countries) (19). This allows you to locate the dog almost anywhere with a cellular signal. The AirTag is global in terms of technology, but in practice, it depends on the penetration of iPhones in each location. Abroad, especially in rural areas or even some cities with few Apple users, the AirTag may not update at all. In short, if you travel to remote places, GPS guarantees tracking via satellite/cellular, while the AirTag will only help in environments with many iPhones (usually urban). PAJ summarizes: an AirTag "will only work if there are other Apple devices nearby, which does not guarantee global coverage" (20).
In all these cases, the GPS collar provides functionality designed for pets (geofences, active tracking, route history, escape alerts) that an AirTag lacks. The AirTag provides passive tracking, dependent on third parties. This makes the GPS collar more comprehensive in critical situations, although the AirTag can serve as support in favorable environments (cities with a high density of Apple users).
Safety and Reliability Limitations
Both devices have their own limitations. The AirTag is designed for objects, not to withstand a dog's activity. If the dog bites or shakes it, it can be damaged. Tractive warns that the AirTag "can be easily damaged and your furry friend could swallow it" (21). In fact, there are documented cases where a dog ingests it, which may require surgery, as the internal lithium battery is toxic (22). In terms of physical resistance, the comparison table itself indicates that the AirTag is water-resistant (IP67), but "less robust than some specific GPS trackers" (23). In the worst-case scenario, if the AirTag comes off the collar or breaks, tracking is completely lost (and there is a risk to the dog). Also, due to its design, it "has no hole to hang it" (15), which requires extra accessories that can also fail.
The GPS collar also depends on electronic components. If the collar loses signal (e.g., no cellular coverage in a very remote forest), it simply will not report its position until it regains a connection (5). Likewise, if the battery runs out, the device stops working. However, these collars are usually more robust: they are designed for rough outdoor use and many are waterproof, dust-resistant, and shock-resistant (some include reinforced antennas for dense forests) (11). On the other hand, when using mobile networks, there are also security risks (e.g., if there is interference or congestion), but under normal conditions, they are usually reliable.
In summary, from a safety and reliability standpoint, a professional GPS system offers pet-specific features (escape alerts, real-time location) that an AirTag does not have. The AirTag is more fragile and depends on the Apple network for location, so it is not reliable in all situations (7, 20). In both cases, you must ensure the device is properly placed and charged: if the dog loses the collar or if the connection fails (Bluetooth or cellular), tracking is interrupted.
In conclusion, the GPS collar (virtual fence) and the Apple AirTag are very different tools. The GPS collar provides continuous tracking and specific alerts for pets in almost any environment (urban or rural) (1, 5), but requires initial setup and frequent charging. The AirTag stands out for its simplicity and long battery life (12), but only works with Bluetooth/Apple coverage, without real-time tracking or advanced pet features. A dog owner must evaluate whether they need active tracking (for long distances, rural areas, or if the dog gets lost)—where GPS is superior—or if they just want a lightweight backup (in which case the AirTag can help in urban environments). The cited sources summarize these technical differences well (7, 8, 12, 24), helping to choose according to the needs of each pet.
References: (Data obtained from the websites of Tractive, PAJ, and Applesfera, among others.)
(1, 4, 6, 7, 10, 12, 18, 21, 22) El uso de Apple AirTags para perros - Tractive
(2) AirTag for Dogs: Why You're Better Off With A GPS Dog Tracker - Tractive
(3, 9, 13, 17, 20, 23, 24) Airtag par perros
(5, 8, 15, 16, 19) Apple AirTag VS localizadores GPS: qué diferencias hay y cuál elegir según uso y necesidades
(11) SpotOn Fence | Most Accurate Wireless Dog Fence and GPS Dog Collar
https://spotonfence.com/?srsltid=AfmBOoqBxDKUy1iy9s6K6Lc5p6zSg2YdMMlhLQ3hDrnuZw5YwyKb_YvI
(14) Agregar un AirTag a Encontrar para dar seguimiento a los artículos personales - Soporte técnico de Apple
AgroPetEd
Information about animals and agricultural practices
© 2025. All rights reserved.