Stress in Cattle: Causes, Consequences, and Management Practices
Stress in cattle occurs when animals face conditions that exceed their ability to adapt (e.g., climate changes, feeding, handling, transportation).
ANIMAL PRODUCTION
8/19/20258 min read
Stress in cattle occurs when animals face conditions that exceed their ability to adapt (e.g., climate changes, feeding, handling, transportation) (1). Numerous studies highlight that stressful conditions not only compromise animal welfare and health but also negatively affect the productive and economic efficiency of the livestock industry (2, 3). Ranchers and international organizations (OIE/WOAH, FAO, technical institutes) agree on the importance of promoting rational management with an emphasis on animal welfare, as proper handling improves performance and profitability (2, 3).
Main Causes of Stress in Cattle
Stress in cattle can originate from multiple factors, which often act in combination (1). The main causes include:
Extreme Environmental Conditions: Abrupt changes in temperature or humidity, strong winds, prolonged rains, intense heat or cold, droughts, or floods (4). Continuous exposure to excessive heat generates "thermal stress," which consumes energy that would otherwise be used for weight gain and decreases appetite (5, 6).
Poor Infrastructure and Housing: Precarious or poorly designed corrals, with low-capacity water troughs/feeders, poor ventilation, slippery or dirty floors, inadequate lighting, and overcrowding (7, 8). For example, a lack of shade in pastures can increase thermal stress and impair bovine homeostasis (5, 6).
Rough or Abrupt Handling: Fast or violent handling procedures (hasty herding, use of sticks or prods, yelling, sudden maneuvers) increase the animals' fear and anxiety (3, 9). Drastic environmental changes (weaning, moving pastures, milking, vaccination) are also very stressful situations if they are not done carefully.
Inadequate Transportation: Overcrowding, sudden movements, vibrations, long journeys, and a lack of rest stops during transport cause severe stress. The OMSA (OIE/WOAH) warns that "poor conditions during transport increase stress, cause injuries, illnesses and deaths, and lead to serious economic consequences" (10).
Insufficient or Changing Feed and Water: Prolonged fasting before slaughter, inadequate diets, or sudden changes in feed (dry vs. lush pastures) cause metabolic stress. Thirst and hunger generate physiological alert responses in the cattle (8, 11).
Negative Human Interactions: Mistreatment, yelling, invasive maneuvers, and inconsistent treatment psychologically affect cattle. It has been shown that animals accustomed to close contact and calm handling have significantly lower cortisol levels (a stress hormone) than unhandled animals (3, 12).
These stressors often compound one another: for example, combining high temperatures with transport or overcrowding intensifies the stress response (13). In a feedlot, for instance, confinement with little space and high densities exacerbates stress and promotes illness if not managed correctly (14).
Physiological, Productive, and Health Consequences
Stress activates neuroendocrine systems (the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis) that raise cortisol and catecholamine levels, triggering drastic physiological responses (tachycardia, glycogenolysis, immune suppression, etc.) (2, 15). These adaptive reactions have negative impacts on health and productivity:
Compromised Immune System: The immune defense is weakened, making stressed animals more susceptible to infections and diseases (8, 16).
Lower Intake and Weight Gain: Stress inhibits appetite and rumination, decreasing feed efficiency. Highly agitated cattle during handling show less weight gain than animals handled calmly (17, 18).
Low Milk Production: In dairy cows, thermal stress or other stressors can reduce dry matter intake by up to 25%, leading to drops in milk production (19). Studies in Brazil found that Gir cows under shade produced an average of 24% more milk (an additional 732 kg per lactation) than their counterparts exposed to the sun (6).
Reproductive Disorders: Stress alters reproductive hormones (decreasing oxytocin, raising cortisol) and delays estrus, reducing fertility and pregnancy rates (20, 21). For example, cattle that suffered intense thermal stress produced fewer embryos and had poorer semen quality, affecting bull fertility (22, 23).
Deteriorated Meat Quality: Pre-slaughter stress depletes muscle glycogen reserves. This raises post-mortem pH and causes dark, firm, and dry (DFD) meat with a shorter shelf life and lower consumer appeal (24, 25). Additionally, stressed animals often suffer from bruising and contusions, which lead to economic losses in the industry (for example, in the U.S., it is estimated that $35 million is lost annually due to bruising in cattle) (25).
Economic Cost: Globally, stress translates into losses. One study estimated that in the U.S. dairy industry, losses from heat stress exceed $100 per cow per year (26). In general, it has been shown that farms with careful management achieve better economic results and avoid inefficiencies throughout the production chain (3, 27).
In summary, bovine stress increases veterinary costs, reduces productivity (weight, milk, fertility), and deteriorates product quality, affecting the profitability of the operation.
Effective Strategies to Reduce Stress
To mitigate these negative effects, animal welfare practices are recommended at all stages of production. The following strategies stand out:
Appropriate Facility Design: Corrals, chutes, and alleys should be built with wide pathways, non-slip surfaces, and no elements that obstruct movement. Uniform lighting should be ensured, and shadows or reflections that might startle the cattle should be avoided. The use of reflective roofs or natural ventilation reduces excess solar radiation. Providing enough space (e.g., ~0.8 m²/cow at feeders and 3.5–4.5 m²/cow of shade) prevents competition and social stress (8, 28).
Accessible Shade and Drinking Water: Providing natural shade (well-distributed trees) or artificial shade in corrals and pastures is very effective in alleviating thermal stress. Studies indicate that cows with shade show greater comfort (lower respiratory rate) and up to 10–24% more milk production (6, 28). Water troughs must be clean, well-positioned (so that the animal does not have to travel more than ~250 m), and have fresh water available at all times (8, 29).
Calm Handling and Staff Training: Educating staff in rational handling is key. It is essential to avoid hitting, yelling at, or unnecessarily threatening the animals, as well as working in an organized and patient manner. Calm handling (using flags or soft sticks, avoiding abrupt maneuvers) significantly reduces fear and stress in the cattle (3, 30). It is recommended to group animals by category (lactating cows, pregnant cows, heifers, calves, etc.) to minimize fights and conflicting hierarchies (31). Continuous staff training in welfare (including transporters) improves productive results (30, 32).
Routines and Thermal Comfort: Adjusting handling schedules (grazing, milking, vaccination) to avoid the hottest hours of the day can reduce stress. For example, moving up or delaying milking and providing fans or sprinklers in milking parlor waiting areas improves the welfare of dairy cows in the summer. In confined systems, maintaining cross-ventilation and optimal humidity levels (through low-pressure sprinklers) dissipates body heat (26, 33).
Design of Loading Corrals and Transport: Loading ramps should have firm walkways and no open gaps between the truck and the structure to prevent escapes and collisions (34). When docking the truck, ensure there are no gaps. Load in small groups to prevent bottlenecks. For transport, it is critical to plan the trip, ensuring ventilation, regular rest stops for feeding and drinking, and floors covered with straw bedding. These measures comply with OMSA/OIE standards and reduce injuries and weight loss during transport (10, 35).
Nutritional and Health Practices: Maintaining balanced diets and clean water prevents stress from hunger or thirst. The proper distribution of feed by category (first breeding bulls, then fresh cows, etc.) avoids competition and feeding stress (36). Additionally, a regular health calendar (vaccinations, deworming) carried out with good handling reduces immunological stress and its associated costs (8).
These infrastructure and management strategies have low or moderate initial costs but generate rapid benefits. For example, providing adequate shade and ventilation in barns or pastures often translates into a positive return in the form of higher production or better reproductive indices (reducing open periods and culling) (6, 21).
Practical Examples and Economic Benefits
Various cases illustrate the positive impact of investing in animal comfort:
Silvopastoral System (Brazil): In an Embrapa experiment, Nelore bulls raised in pastures with eucalyptus shade had a lower frequency of visits to the water trough (–26% water consumption) and achieved the same weight gain with ~20% less forage, indicating greater metabolic efficiency (6, 37). In the dairy industry, Gir cows in the shade produced 24% more milk (an additional 732 kg per lactation) than cows without shade (6). Additionally, fertility improved: heifers under shade notably increased oocyte production and pregnancy rates (from 40–50% to 63–65%) (21, 23). According to experts, the integrated agroforestry system (shade + cattle + crops) "is smart" because it combines sustainability with greater profitability for the producer (21).
Handling and Transport: Studies by Temple Grandin and others show that rough handling in feedlot corrals reduces daily gains; nervous cattle entering the handling chute have significantly lower weight than calm cattle (18). Large slaughterhouses confirm that pre-slaughter stress increases dark cuts and bruising, devaluing the meat (24, 25). In the U.S., it is estimated that bruising on hides and meat costs the industry tens of millions of dollars a year (25). Conversely, well-designed corrals and trained staff (as promoted by BQA certification) show fewer injuries and better yields.
Health and Reproduction: Dairy farms with management programs that minimize stress (thermal control, uniform milking, comfortable rest areas) report better lactation persistence and shorter calving intervals. Data from Israel, for example, reveals losses of up to 1,000 kg of milk per lactation in cows that calved in the hot summer (38). Mitigating heat stress through shade and cooling, therefore, has a clear economic impact by sustaining production and reproductive efficiency.
Market and Certifications: Finally, global demand points toward products with a welfare seal. International standards (EC Regulation 1/2005, OMSA/OIE codes) require respectful practices during transport and fattening. As the OMSA highlights, complying with these standards is an investment that "increases the value of each operation" (39). Cattle managed under low-stress principles produce higher-quality food and require fewer health interventions, aspects valued by markets and consumers.
In short, studies indicate that every dollar invested in improving the thermal comfort or handling of cattle tends to yield several dollars in production and health. For example, heat mitigation systems studied in the U.S. proved to be economically optimal, with losses limited to ~$100 per cow/year versus $167 without mitigation (26). Although these values vary by region, the principle is clear: investing in animal welfare reduces production risks and increases the overall profitability of the livestock system (26, 27).
Conclusion
Reducing stress in cattle is fundamental for both ethical and economic reasons. Identifying and controlling stressors—climate, handling, transport, feeding, human interactions—prevents the deterioration of animal health and productivity (1, 2). Implementing strategies based on appropriate facility design, providing shade and water, using calm handling routines, and training staff ensures healthier and more productive animals (3, 40). The benefits are reflected in greater growth, better milk production, optimal fertility, and fewer losses from injuries or culling. Therefore, ranchers who adopt welfare practices see a positive economic impact through improved efficiency and higher-quality products (2, 21). In a global context where consumers and regulations demand high standards, these practices not only promote responsible animal treatment but also strengthen the competitiveness and economic sustainability of the livestock industry (10, 21).
Sources: Scientific studies and technical manuals from the FAO, OMSA/OIE, and research centers (SciELO, INTA, Embrapa) support the direct relationship between stress management and improved productive and economic outcomes in cattle (1, 2, 3, 6).
(1, 2, 4, 7, 9,11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 19, 20, 24, 27, 38) Estrés en ganado: causas y consecuencias
https://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1669-68402017000100014
(3, 18) PRINCIPIOS DE COMPORTAMIENTO ANIMAL PARA EL MANEJO DE BOVINOS Y OTROS HERBIVOROS EN CONDICIONES EXTENSIVAS
(5, 6, 21, 22, 23, 37) Los árboles en las pasturas mejoran la productividad bovina : Revista Pesquisa Fapesp
https://revistapesquisa.fapesp.br/es/los-arboles-en-las-pasturas-mejoran-la-productividad-bovina/
(8, 30, 31, 36, 40) Manejo sanitaria eficiente del ganado bovino: principales enfermedades
https://www.fao.org/4/as497s/as497s.pdf
(10, 32, 39)Transporte de animales: aplicar normas de bienestar animal
https://www.woah.org/es/articulo/transporte-de-animales-aplicar-normas-de-bienestar-animal/
(25) C:\Bavera\PERSON~4\PRODUC~2\INFORM~1\etologia\86-bienestar_e_impacto_economico.htm
(26) La Economía del Estrés por Calor: Implicaciones para el Manejo – DAIReXNET
https://dairy-cattle.extension.org/la-economia-del-estres-por-calor-implicaciones-para-el-manejo/
(28, 29, 33) ¿Qué estrategias implementar para mitigar el estrés por calor?
(34) bienestar animal 28.cdr
(35) ESTRÉS EN EL GANADO: Cómo prevenir el estrés del ganado en el transporte | Alltech
AgroPetEd
Information about animals and agricultural practices
© 2025. All rights reserved.